BLINK holders govern the network.
Governance is not an advisory board. It is the control layer for protocol parameters, compliance rules, and treasury spending. Every vote is recorded on-chain and every passed proposal executes automatically.
What the community decides.
Different decisions require different thresholds. The most sensitive changes need the broadest consensus.
Compliance rule updates
Updates to KYC/AML rules, jurisdiction policies, and regulator access require a supermajority to protect minority holders.
Parameter changes
Fees, block size, staking parameters, and other protocol settings can be adjusted by simple majority vote.
New chain issuance
Approving new chains in the BLINK mesh requires both governance approval and a compliance review.
Treasury allocation
Funding ecosystem grants, developer bounties, and protocol development from the community treasury.
From idea to execution.
A transparent, four-stage process that gives the community time to review, debate, and decide.
Proposal submission
Any BLINK holder meeting the minimum stake can submit a proposal with a deposit.
Discussion period
The community discusses the proposal, asks questions, and suggests amendments.
Voting period
BLINK holders vote on-chain. 1 BLINK equals 1 vote, with quadratic voting options.
Execution
If the proposal passes its threshold, it is executed automatically by the protocol.
Why compliance governance matters.
Regulations change. Markets evolve. BLINK's community can update compliance rules through governance, making the network adaptive without requiring a hard fork or centralized intervention.
This means BLINK can respond to new frameworks — MiCA updates, US stablecoin legislation, MAS guidelines — through a transparent, democratic process that regulators can observe and trust.
Your stake is your voice.
BLINK governance is designed to balance influence, participation, and long-term alignment.
1 BLINK = 1 vote
Voting power is proportional to stake, giving long-term holders a meaningful say.
Quadratic voting
Optional quadratic voting reduces the influence of the largest holders on sensitive proposals.
On-chain execution
Passed proposals execute automatically, removing the need for trusted intermediaries.